Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Would Accept This Pic On A.net...?  
User currently offlineDid From France, joined Aug 2005, 2 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 629 times:

Hi every body,
Is any (good) reason why this picture was rejected for airliners.net..? i'dont understand what's really wrong (sometimes i'do..; ;<) ). Tanks for help. Did

http://www.flickr.com/photos/9302672@N08/2695874179/

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTransIsland From Bahamas, joined Mar 2004, 1469 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (2 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 615 times:

Well, it's kinda hard to tell from the small flickr image... how about posting the actual rejected file that you uploaded to a.net.

At first glance though, the highlights look blown out.


I'm an aviation expert. I have Sky Juice for breakfast.
User currently offlineNIKV69 From United States, joined Jan 2004, 6537 posts, RR: 38
Reply 2, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 494 times:

Nice subject! Would have to see the original though. Can you post it?


Obama could have went to see wounded soldiers, he went to the gym instead. McCain, country first.
User currently offlineGranite From United Kingdom (Scotland), joined May 1999, 5318 posts, RR: 64
Reply 3, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 491 times:		 AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Hello

Yes, need to tell us why it was rejected also.

Small image looks good but you need to show/tell us more.

Regards

Gary


Airliners.net
User currently offlineScotland1979 From Canada, joined Feb 2005, 502 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 445 times:		 AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER



Quoting TransIsland (Reply 1):
hard to tell from the small flickr image

Need larger photo so we can tell from there


Pride Comes From What You Do When No One Is Watching
User currently offlineDid From France, joined Aug 2005, 2 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 390 times:

Hi,
Here is the original pictures that was rejected (any size problem...?)
i'dont see...
thanks for your comments :

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...main?filename=20080723_bucker2.jpg

User currently offlineNIKV69 From United States, joined Jan 2004, 6537 posts, RR: 38
Reply 6, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 386 times:

Yes 1024 by 780 is too big, try using 1024 by 683 would look better.


Obama could have went to see wounded soldiers, he went to the gym instead. McCain, country first.
User currently offlineStealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 3351 posts, RR: 32
Reply 7, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 371 times:		 Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 6):
Yes 1024 by 780 is too big

Well, no it isn't 4:3 aspect ratio is perfectly acceptable here, Agree it might look better at a 3:2 crop.(a personal & subjective opinion)

Might be an info rejection as location is clearly NOT "In Flight"... the dreaded "Level" reject might be a possibility as well

Nice Pic though,

Cheers

Chris


Of course old planes are safe, how do you think they got to be old?
User currently offlineBubbles From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1095 posts, RR: 45
Reply 8, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 366 times:		 AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER



Quoting StealthZ (Reply 7):
Might be an info rejection as location is clearly NOT "In Flight"

And other info also has problems.

Quoting StealthZ (Reply 7):
"Level" reject might be a possibility

Yes, clockwise rotation is needed.

_Hongyin_

User currently offlineJonny From United States, joined Dec 2007, 35 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 342 times:

Well, the photo isn't level for one thing. I happen to think that there is too much sharpening around the tail area. A somewhat clockwise rotation is needed, just as Bubbles has mentioned.
I also agree with size ratios.

It might have some info problems since it is not very what I call "today's edge". What I mean is it is an old aircraft meaning there might be some info problems.

Hope this helps!

Jonny

User currently offlineQswags From United States, joined Feb 2006, 3 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 309 times:

Looking at the edges that outline the plane it might be rejected for 'soft'. I have had some pictures that were rejected for that reason and they looked as sharp as the edges you have here. I would have to agree that the tail does look a little bit oversharpened since you can see jaggies on the x. If you have Photoshop some time should be invested in careful sharpening. Great picture otherwise.

Quentin


"I think your problem is low self-esteem, that's a common problem with losers."
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
My 5 Year Old Son's First Pic On A.net! posted Mon Jul 19 2004 01:00:46 by Andyhunt
Your Pic On A.net? posted Sat Jan 31 2004 05:19:53 by Ua777222
Least Popular Pic On A.net posted Wed Oct 1 2003 20:21:18 by WERNAIR
Plug Time, My 500th Pic On A.net posted Mon May 12 2003 07:17:31 by Paulianer
My First Pic On A.Net! posted Thu Oct 10 2002 09:32:29 by Bigphilnyc
What Was Your First Pic On A.net? posted Wed Apr 24 2002 10:28:56 by Hias
First Pic On A.net posted Wed Dec 26 2001 05:15:34 by CleCo
Would A.net Accept This? posted Wed Jul 14 2004 05:05:42 by DLKAPA
Would This Kind Of Photo Be Welcome On A.net? posted Mon Jan 6 2003 09:12:11 by Thom@s
Would A.net Accept This Photo? posted Tue Aug 20 2002 20:46:09 by Pilatus